Ideally, the NSS should meet the following criteria: common legal base, common implementation framework, common UNFPOS, i.e., applying the same set of standards, methods and definitions based on international recommendations, and defined function of a leader or chief statistician (UNSD, 2022).
A successful NSS should have the flexibility to respond to changing conditions and circumstances without needing to change its primary legislation frequently. A statistical system that on one side ensures the stability of key principles and structures with the necessary flexibility might combine several legal instruments: 1) a national law on official statistics which remains more general; 2) regulations, orders, or decrees implementing the national law and dealing with specific issues; and 3) guidelines and handbooks clarifying technical and methodological issues in more detail (UNSD, 2022).
NSSs can range from more “centralized” to more “decentralized”. NSSs are more centralised when most products of the NSS are produced and disseminated by a central organisation, such as the NSO. Conversely, systems are more decentralised when statistics are produced by many different Ministries and Agencies that are more closely tied to a specific sector – such as health statistics being produced by the Health Ministry. Most NSSs lie between these two extremes: such as Mozambique where education and health statistics are produced by the respective Ministries but the NSO produces most of country’s statistics and has overall responsibility for the NSS. While centralized systems tend to be stronger on data quality and integrity, they tend to struggle on relevancy especially in relation to specific sector in which statistics need to be frequently updated in line with current trends and policymaking (PARIS21, 2005).
Figure 1: Strengths and limitations of (de)centralized NSSs
|
Centralized |
Decentralized |
Advantages |
-ability to plan and coordinate across whole statistical system
-ability to set long term priorities and divert funding to them
-‘one stop shopping’ for statistics
-organisational focus on statistical issues emphasises integrity and impartiality and common work ethos
|
-policy relevance
-strong statistical linkage to administrative management and information systems
|
Disadvantages |
-divorced from main Government users, perceived lack of responsiveness
|
-difficult to coordinate and place system wide, sectoral interests take precedence over common good
-open to political pressure, perceived if not actual
-difficult to set common standards
|
(Source: PARIS21, 2005)
Finally, close cooperation between the NSO and other producers of official statistics is strongly recommended in international fora and is exercised in most countries. Most countries recognize the role of the NSO in providing the professional leadership of the NSS. The NSO is the designated specialized statistical agency of the government. Official statistics are its main – and often only – concern. It is expected to have the greatest oversight over the needs for official statistics and the extent to which they are satisfied. Moreover, the NSO is most often the country’s representative in the international statistical cooperation with the responsibility of ensuring that international standards and recognized scientific methods and procedures are followed. In some contexts, however, the NSO may lack the authority to coordinate a NSS and when it comes to migration data, specifically, other agencies, such as the Ministry of Interior, may hold ownership over the most relevant data. In these contexts, close cooperation, founded on an inter-ministerial working group is crucial.