International migration flows
Migration flows data capture the number of migrants entering and leaving (inflow and outflow) a country over the course of a specific period, such as one year (UN SD, 2017). Data on migration flows are essential for understanding global migration patterns and how different factors and policies in countries of origin and destination may be related to flows. However, in contrast to migration stocks data, estimates on migration inflows and outflows by country of origin and destination are not available at the global level. EUROSTAT record data on immigration and emigration to and from EU Member States.
Migration flows data on migrants entering and leaving over the course of a given time period (usually a calendar year) are often confused with migration stock data which estimate all migrants residing in a country at a particular point in time (UN SD, 2017).
Definition
Migration flows “refer to the number of migrants entering or leaving a given country during a given period of time, usually one calendar year” (UN SD, 2017). However, countries use different concepts, definitions and data collection methodologies to compile statistics on migration flows. Definitions of who counts as an international migrant vary over time in the same country and across countries.
Recent trends
Due to the lack of comparable data in many regions in the world, it is difficult to describe global trends of migration flows. Annual, comparable migration flows data are largely limited to countries in the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
In 2023, according to preliminary estimates a record 6.5 million new permanent immigrants moved to OECD countries, 10 per cent more than in 2022, and 28 per cent more than in 2019 (OECD, 2024). The countries receiving the most new, permanent-type migrants in 2023 were the United States (1.2 million), the United Kingdom (a record 750,000, +52% from 2022), Germany (700,000, +4% from 2022), Canada (a record 470,000, +7.8%) and Spain (360,000, +12%) (ibid.). Record levels of permanent immigration were registered in a third of OECD countries, including Australia, France, Finland, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg and Switzerland. National, non-standardized data suggest the same trend for Hungary and Poland (ibid.).
Another third of OECD countries registered a reduction in immigration in 2023 from 2022, including Estonia (-36%), Lithuania (‑32%), New Zealand (‑23%) and Israel (‑38%) (ibid.).
Ireland, Luxembourg, the Slovak Republic and Latvia were among other OECD countries where migration flows remained consistent to previously (ibid.).
Family migration is the primary category of entry for international migrants to the OECD, comprising 43 per cent of all new permanent immigrants to the OECD in 2023 (from standardised data). This is 3 per cent higher than in 2022, with growth reportedly driven by family members accompanying labour migrants. Labour migration is the second-highest category of entry for international migrants to the OECD, comprising 20 per cent of all new permanent migrants in 2023, a 2 per cent decrease from 2022. Free circulation is the third-highest category (19 per cent in 2023), a 2 per cent reduction from 2022, and humanitarian the fourth-highest (11 per cent of all immigration to the OECD), increasing for the third consecutive year (OECD, 2024).
Data sources and measurement
Statistics on migration flows are based on a variety of data sources depending on the country. Countries may calculate migration flows based on information from administrative sources, such as data derived from issuance of temporary or permanent residence permits and population registries, or they may use sample survey data. The UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA) has compiled data on the flows of international migrants to and from selected countries since 2005. The latest Revision, in 2015, contained data from 45 countries that collected this information (only 43 on emigration flows) – a steady increase compared to 15 countries in 2005, and 29 countries in 2008. However, this has not since been repeated or updated.
Some countries report data to OECD or the Statistical Office of the European Union (Eurostat) as well. OECD data on permanent migration inflows allow to distinguish between different types of migration flows including work, family and humanitarian migration (OECD, 2023). However, the number of countries reporting flow data is limited and the data are often not harmonized. In addition, UN Statistics Division (UN SD), who has a mandate to collect migration statistics including on migration flows, provides statistics on international travel and migration through their Demographic Yearbook. These migration flows are disaggregated by reason for admission, purpose of staying or going abroad, age and sex.
Eurostat also provides flows data disaggregated by age and sex, covering the EU-27, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. Frontex’s interactive Migratory Map presents up-to-date on the six main migratory routes into the EU, including numbers of illegal border crossings and top countries of origin per route.
The World Bank Databank presents data on Global Bilateral Migration flows from 1960-2000, disaggregated by country of origin, country of destination, gender and year. Researchers have also developed their own estimates of (bilateral) global migration flows based on 5-year intervals (see Abel and Cohen, 2019; Raymer et al., 2013). These estimates are based on UN and World Bank statistics on changes in migrant stocks over time.
The International Organization for Migration’s Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM), a system to track and monitoring population displacement and mobility, collects migration flows data through flow monitoring component in more than 30 countries. DTM flow monitoring assesses areas of high mobility, often at key entry, exit and transit locations. Flow monitoring activities aim to derive quantitative estimates of the flow of individuals through specific locations and to collect information about the profiles, intentions and needs of the people moving. Tools used under this component include baseline assessments at national and local levels, flow monitoring registries and in-depth surveys.
Back to topData strengths and limitations
The quantification of migration flows is fundamental for the analysis of contemporary migration patterns, particularly the impacts of different factors and policies in countries of origin and destination. Inflow statistics compiled by OECD are available by category of entry, such as whether people moved for reasons of work (including seasonal workers), family reunification, humanitarian protection or others. Numbers of people moving within areas of free circulation such as the European Union or the Southern Common Market (Mercosur) are also indicated separately in the OECD’s International Migration Database.
However, the availability of international migration flows data are limited:
- Flow data from UN DESA are only compiled for 45 countries worldwide or estimated by region, but have not been updated since 2015 (UN DESA, 2015).
- Those countries that do report flows often use different concepts, definitions and data collection methodologies which can make the comparison of flows across countries difficult.
- Flow monitoring tracks movement of people in and out of a country, but is limited in recording international migration, distinguishing one-way and circular migration, and using a systematic sampling frame.
- There are challenges associated with the use of administrative sources to derive statistics on international migration flows: such sources usually record events (e.g. issuance/renewal/withdrawal of a residence permit) and may not necessarily reflect actual migration movements (e.g. a residence permit is not renewed but the person stays in the country, or the permit is renewed but the person leaves the country).
Further reading
United Nations Department for Economic and Social Affairs Statistical Division (UN SD) | |
---|---|
2017 | Handbook on Measuring International Migration through Population Censuses. Background document. Statistical Commission, Forty-eighth session 7-10 March 2017, Item 4(a) of the provisional agenda, Demographic Statistics. UN, New York. |
Global Migration Group (GMG) | |
2017 | Handbook for Improving the Production and Use of Migration Data for Development. KNOMAD, World Bank, Washington, D.C. |
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA) | |
2015 | International Migration Flows to and from Selected Countries: the 2015 Revision. |
Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) | |
2024 | International Migration Outlook 2024. OECD, Paris. |
Abel, G. J. and N. Sander | |
2014 | Quantifying global international migration flows. Science, 343 (6178):1520-1522. |
Abel, G. J. | |
2016 | Estimates of global bilateral migration flows by gender between 1960 and 2015. Vienna Institute of Demography. Working Papers 2/2016 |
Raymer, J., A. Wiśniowski, J. Forster, P. Smith and J. Bijak | |
2013 | Integrated modeling of European migration. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 108 (503): 801-819. |
International Migration Institute (IMI) | |
2017 | DEMIC C2C Data. University of Oxford, Oxford. |
Nawrotzki, R. J. and L. Jiang | |
2014 | Community Demographic Model International Migration (CDM-IM) Dataset : Generating Age and Gender Profiles of International Migration Flows. NCAR Technical Note NCAR/TN-508+STR, 41 pp, doi:10.5065/D6NS0RV2. |
Abel, G. J., and K.C. Samir and N. Sander | |
2013 | Examining the Role of International Migration in Global Population Projections. Conference paper, Vienna. |
Lemaitre, G., T. Liebig, C. Thoreau, P. Fron | |
2007 | Standardized statistics on immigrant inflows: results, sources and methods. OECD, Paris. |